Spotlight: Meghan & Analytics on Academia.edu

I’ve been featured on the academia.edu blog in a discussion about the intersections of my work, the analytics the site provides, and pursuing new lines of research.

analyticsAcademiaEdu

A snapshot of analytics visualizations from Academia.edu

It was a fascinating discussion with science writer Courtney Quirin – I shared my approaches and the ways I’ve chronicled the movement of people through keywords to my profile; she also suggested a few great ways to improve my interpretation of those numbers.* If you are considering sharing your research and want a great platform to connect with scholars in intersecting ways, academia.edu could be the right place for you.

Do you already use profile analytics from academia.edu? Let me know if you have any best practice tips to share!

 

*Allow me to clarify that I have not been asked to give any endorsement of the social networking site, nor am I receiving anything other than good tips from Courtney to increase my ability to analyze the numbers!

Smithsonian Institution Transcription Center in Beta

We launched the Smithsonian Digital Volunteers Transcription Center Friday 21 June as a collaborative, crowdsourced process that aims to bring digitized collections out from archives and museums. We are inviting our SERIOUSLY AMAZING audiences to help us unlock their stories by transcribing and reviewing their contents – to make them more accessible, searchable, and open.

This is another outstanding opportunity to make webs of knowledge and learn about the connections between collections. Please jump in and help where you can!

**UPDATE** (14 October): The Transcription Center is fully back in business with new features to launch shortly – while many projects have been moved to completion, there are still plenty of pages to transcribe and review. Join the community of digital volunteers!

Findings in Ft. Huachuca Valley
Leonhard Stejneger details the findings of a biological survey in the San Francisco mountain region in 1889.

My role has involved advising on use for communities of practice, understanding crowdsourcing capabilities, and developing coherent narratives for the pieces – rather than technical development – but I welcome feedback on usability, design, and any other “would be nice.”

Feel free to transcribe and offer feedback if you have thoughts to share! The service is still in beta and we are constantly integrating what we learn from users. Thanks for allowing me to share this successful first step in our transcription process – more to follow…

Editors Unite: Expeditions & Explorers

On Friday, I was pleased to co-host Expeditions & Explorers – a Wikipedia edit-a-thon bringing new and experienced editors together with focus on materials from the Field Book Project.

Below are the slides I used to introduce a few of our participants to editing on Wikipedia.  Rather than a pure “How-to,” the slides reflect “How to think, plan, and execute your edits.” I welcome feedback and suggestions – send me your best practice tips for editing on Wikipedia!

This Wikipedia edit-a-thon was a smashing success! We created four new articles, fleshed out existing articles, introduced new people to the Wikipedia project, exchanged a lot of best practice tips and resources. We also had an amazing lunch, courtesy of grant money from Wikimedia DC (thank you!). I hope the participants enjoyed themselves, developed skills, and learned more about the scientists and expeditions. A more detailed review of our work is in the works, so watch this space…

The Field Book Project is a joint Smithsonian Institution Archives and National Museum of Natural History initiative that is focused on preserving and digitizing field notes from scientists and researchers. The overall mission of the initiative is “to create one online location for scholars and others to visit when searching for field books and other field research materials.” Also find more information from Smithsonian Institution Archives.

Online Behavior, Digital Literacy, & Seeking Info Safely

Last week, Ofcom (UK) released a qualitative study of internet behavio(u)r and the results are both predictable and fascinating. One key given is that experiences were dictated by levels of digital literacy; this reminds us that there are real-world effects on skill and knowledge development that result from lack of regular access to digital technologies. The study also concerned strategies that users employ to remain “safe” in the online world as they seek information and services.

This is a fascinating study for those of us interested in learning and the construction of knowledge(s) online and through digital technologies. Ofcom – independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communications industries – shared the findings of the qualitative work conducted by Ipsos MORI on 10 June 2013. The study concludes that “Information Seeking” dominates internet users’ activities – followed by online shopping; pertinent findings for how we can frame and understand information we place online as educators. The study found that participants make subconscious decisions weighing risks and benefits while performing their activities. Therefore, because information seeking is low risk and high reward (low cost, high benefit) it has the best ratio of benefits to drawback and is the prevalent online behavior.

As educators and researchers, we should consider the ways in which people discover and integrate knowledge in the digital realm; then we should also think about these impact of these rapid-paced decisions. There are, of course, entire industries devoted to “getting someone’s attention” online… but perhaps this is more about understanding how that span of attention can be best linked to other spans of attention, to make bridges of knowledge that cover the gaps between.

Another intriguing conclusion: people did not frequently perform civic duties or information-seeking about civic services online. This could be an important finding regarding spreading information and leading behavior for services such as waste management, power, and services.

Read details of the report through the link and the report summary below:

Ofcom has today published qualitative research carried out by Ipsos MORI, looking at how people use the internet and interact with online services. “Being online: an investigation of people’s habits and attitudes” was commissioned to inform Ofcom’s duties in relation to consumers’ and citizens’ communications interests, and its regulatory duty to promote media literacy. The study finds that people tend to make subconscious trade-offs between risk and rewards in their online activities. People use very varied strategies for staying safe online, and there is little consensus as to what these strategies should be, as well as misconceptions about what constitutes “safe” behaviour.

We will use these findings to help further our media literacy research programme, identifying core areas to track over time via quantitative research. In addition, we intend to engage with stakeholders to highlight possible areas of focus for end-user initiatives, relating to online security, perception of risk, use of personal data and attitudes to rights and responsibilities.