Webs of Knowledge in Action IRL

Last week, I was privy to an amazing experience – I saw webs of knowledge unfold across digital space and found my researching realms overlapping. Webs of knowledge in action – in real life (IRL)!

Backstory: In February, I participated in a Smithsonian American Art Museum-hosted Wikipedia edit-a-thon focusing on Civil War landscape art. At the beginning of the event, we had a dynamic tour of the Civil War and American Art exhibit by curator Eleanor J. Harvey and learned about the integration of moments of conflict in landscape art in 19th century America. We closed the tour with a discussion of an 1865 painting by Frederic Edwin Church called “Aurora Borealis.” The piece is stunning in person and I took on the challenge of creating a new Wikipedia article about Aurora Borealis (painting). I returned to the article several times and continue to flesh it out – incidentally, I welcome anyone else to contribute to the article with content, editing, or relating the piece to other works.

Last week, while scrolling on Tumblr, I noticed the following post by a blog I follow:

AuroraBorealisWikipTumblr_17apr13

Upon seeing this post in my feed, I mused, “I really love that image – that is such a great painting” –

Then, however, I noticed that the post cited Wikipedia as the source (see circled component in the image above).

THEN, I realized… “golly, that’s MY article – I created that article and here it is being promoted, shared, liked, and reblogged by Tumblr users

This is a fascinating example of cultural heritage content held at a museum being linked (literally) in a central and open access knowledge repository, then accessed and shared in a social networking space: overlapping forms of digital communication.

This was a social share of Smithsonian content; by way of an outreach and engagement event that sought to share Smithsonian collections by explaining their context and content through (or on) Wikipedia. Then that content was taken up by a user on a social media network and shared with his followers. Then his followers responded to that content by liking and reblogging and replying to the content. This Smithsonian-housed content was, therefore, literally linked to broader scientific debates via @ikenbot’s page and the Tumblr/social media sharing loop.

Also, as a leader in the science Tumblr section, @ikenbot’s decision to reference the Wikipedia article adds authority or credit to the validity of Wikipedia within that particular community of practice on Tumblr (science-focused bloggers).

The original post: http://ikenbot.tumblr.com/post/48160589544/aurora-borealis-is-an-1865-painting-by-frederic

Is this a case of “If you build it, they will share…”? Perhaps not, yet this instance is a powerfully persuasive example, even as a one-off. It demonstrates the realities of sourcing and sharing content in digital spaces; furthermore, it is a testament to the ways Smithsonian Institution and Wikipedia content meshes and unfolds across digital space through social and cultural behaviors in digital spaces. Plus, it was quite cool to have my own words cited and sourced as a part of the summarization of the image.

Finally, if you have time and are in the DC area, please do visit the Civil War and American Art exhibit; and hurry! The exhibit closes April 28, 2013 and moves to MoMA in NYC in May through September. More information is available through the link, including podcasts and exhibit guides.

Reddit: Cautions and Challenges in Crowdsourcing

Neal Ungerleider (@nealunger on Twitter) writes for Fast Company about Redditors’ efforts in sleuthing crowdsourced information on the Boston Marathon bombing suspects in the attached link. Notable is Ungerleider’s cautious balance in critiquing the motivations of participants and the utility of crowdsourcing information at an event.

In exploring the behavior on this subreddit, a pertinent takeaway from this situation emerges: crowdsourcing in investigative situations is best for gathering data (that can be used by analysts to offset more specific intelligence) but becomes unreliable and even dangerous as misinformation if participants are given space to assert conclusions.

Conversely, crowdsourced data, coupled with conclusions, can be helpful for cultural heritage projects like the ones on which I am working; in these situations, we may have serendipitous moments of discovery in relation to collections and the hidden stories of our archives. In both cases, the cautions of the Reddit case are useful considerations in understanding and relating to users/audiences.

The Digital Public Library of America (DPLA)

Linking past to present, and considering the revolutionary framing of knowledge and visions for the future across space and time, Robert Darnton discusses next week’s launch of the Digital Public Library of America. This post links to one of my favorite tumblr presences, exploreblog, and their summary of Darnton’s perspectives.

I’m enthralled by the process and particularly interested in the shifts of institutional (and academic) thinking that will be required to make DPLA a success. As I also applied to be a ACLS Public fellow for DPLA, I am closely tracking developments and partnerships, such as the recent announcement the UVA libraries and the Bioheritage Diversity Library are teaming up with DPLA.

DPLA launches on April 18 and more information can be found here.

 

CFP: Digital Anthropology (DANG) at AAA 2013

A last minute nudge toward a call for paper abstracts on the overlap of online and physical IRL ethnographic practices for researching “digital publics.” Seeking insight into methods & ethics for a panel session at AAA 2013, the Digital Anthropology Group wants YOU for this year’s American Anthropological Association meeting in – submit an abstract TODAY 10 April for review. There are still a few hours left to join the conversation!

Call for Papers: “Digital Anthropologists’ Current Engagements with 21st Century Publics” – #Digital Publics, #Ethics, #Methods, #Insights

The panel organizers are particularly interested in exploring major questions such as:

  • How do anthropologists collect and analyze data while doing digital field work?
  • What are the ethical issues facing anthropologists who rely on visual data and texts collected in the digital publics of the internet (social networking sites, forums, websites, etc)?
  • How does digital anthropology intersect with the physical as people increasingly act in physical space in response to the digital realm?
  • What kind of “future publics” are being constructed through today’s “current engagements” by users and anthropologists in the cyberspatial plazas of the internet (social networking sites, etc.)?

These questions can be explored in the panel through “ethnographic examples and evidence of the interactions between digital/online and physical life” – while linking the future of anthropological engagements with the public to current concerns about digital studies in anthropology.

Click through for more information and good luck!