Editors Unite: Expeditions & Explorers

On Friday, I was pleased to co-host Expeditions & Explorers – a Wikipedia edit-a-thon bringing new and experienced editors together with focus on materials from the Field Book Project.

Below are the slides I used to introduce a few of our participants to editing on Wikipedia.  Rather than a pure “How-to,” the slides reflect “How to think, plan, and execute your edits.” I welcome feedback and suggestions – send me your best practice tips for editing on Wikipedia!

This Wikipedia edit-a-thon was a smashing success! We created four new articles, fleshed out existing articles, introduced new people to the Wikipedia project, exchanged a lot of best practice tips and resources. We also had an amazing lunch, courtesy of grant money from Wikimedia DC (thank you!). I hope the participants enjoyed themselves, developed skills, and learned more about the scientists and expeditions. A more detailed review of our work is in the works, so watch this space…

The Field Book Project is a joint Smithsonian Institution Archives and National Museum of Natural History initiative that is focused on preserving and digitizing field notes from scientists and researchers. The overall mission of the initiative is “to create one online location for scholars and others to visit when searching for field books and other field research materials.” Also find more information from Smithsonian Institution Archives.

Keyword Round-up: May on Academia.edu

cropped hillsmooheader.png

Back again with the May keyword round-up from Academia.edu, this time with an emphasis on “Heroes & Zeroes” and celebrity athletes and narratives.

A reminder: Academia.edu offers scholars analytics data, as well as the opportunity to understand the ways in which their research is being discovered. Using this data, scholars may be able to better frame their research to interested parties. I’d certainly say there are interested parties in retiring athletes, transitions, and harnessing celebrity of sports figures.

Following a lonely period, my article “Arguably the Greatest: Sports fans and communities at work on Wikipedia” (2009) was given a page-dwelling compadre. I expanded my identity as an academic who explores the conflict-to-consensus process at play on Wikipedia to one who also explores athlete narratives as they intertwine with celebrity – all achieved by posting another article.

This article “HEROES AND ZEROES: Extending Celebrity Athlete Narratives Beyond Retirement” was developed in 2007 and published in the now-defunct journal Football Studies in 2008.  This was a part of my early work in exploring the strands of media(ted) storylines and bundles of cultural values – through which athlete public identities are developed by interconnected sets of meaning . You will notice my early thinking on narrative and the importance of unpacking the ways we tell stories – what and how we say what we mean in media discourse.

In the article, I also proposed a fifth type of professional athlete identity based on contemporary cultural contexts. Here an athlete moves from what Critcher (1979) (1) frames as “traditional/located to transitional/mobile to incorporated/embourgeoised, then to superstars/dislocated.” I argue that the emergence of celebrity grounds the athlete once more in a new realm. I explain: “Though displaced from their former social statuses and lives, this re-rooting in an imagined popular space of celebrity makes these formerly remote stars accessible once more following the cementing of their narrative. Thus the individual is subsumed by a new concept of the brand or celebrity entity – rather than a person, the celebrity is notable for his or her cultural pattern of values.” It was a fascinating exploration and essentially informed what was the first dissertation I wrote prior to embarking on the final version of my doctoral research. If you’re interested, you can read more at my Academia.edu page.

Back to the keywords! My analytics report shows that ten searches were performed through Google and brought visitors to my Academia.edu page. One of these searches was performed on Bing, with the bulk through Google. Visitors searched from the US, UK, Australia, Germany, and Indonesia. The search terms were as follows:

  1. athlete as cultural hero                                         (No ranking provided)
  2. how sporting celebrities cope with retirement     (Google search rank: 1)
  3. retired celebrity women                                        (Google search rank: 1)
  4. culture value of pro athlete endorsement             (Google search rank: 3)
  5. narrative about mia hamm                                    (Google search rank: 1)
  6. the rise of the celebrity athlete in the 1980s –      (Google search rank: 5)
  7. One David Beckham? Celebrity, Masculinity, and the Soccerati /Cashmore, Ellis; Parker, Andrew (2003) In: in: Sociology of sport journal                                     (No ranking provided)

Searches of note: Four searches concerned celebrity and athletes – this is interesting as the notion of celebrity athletes seems to have become both less popular but also redundant. In other words, there is nearly an expectation of celebrity for emerging (let alone retiring) athletes. Retirement transitions were in the crosshairs of 2 searches. Several searches also related to the narrative (also “narrative” sic) and cultural messages conveyed by the athlete. Finally, visitors were seeking information on women athletes.

This month, no searches were directly seeking my scholarship. The addition of this slightly older article demonstrated an intriguing change in the incoming traffic for my page; I only had eight unique visitors to my profile and documents—and 7 document views—in May. Let’s see if June brings in more summer searching.

(1) Critcher, C. (1979). Football Since The War. In J. Clarke, C. Critcher, & R. Johnson (Eds.).
Working-class Culture: Studies in history and theory (pp. 161-184).London: Hutchinson of London.

Where it’s @

From FastCompany, a look at the character world’s maven of reinvention – the @ character symbol

With whimsical beginnings as a rose in bookkeeping then moving to the “navel of the digital body we now call the internet,” John Brownlee’s article unravels the @ symbol. Brownlee chats with Keith Houston, author of Shady Characters: The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and other Typographical Marks. The two authors discuss whether @ is where it’ll stay – as THE character representation of people inhabiting digital realms.

It’s a fascinating look at the capability of characters to transcend language barriers. It also speaks to the use of communication strategies through particular character or representational choices. Finally, the appropriate use of the @ symbol is an excellent example of the ways in which one can demonstrate “insider” status or savvy. This knowledge demonstrated by using the symbol appropriately–whether directing comments toward another digital comrade or sending comments through an electronic system–and even sparingly in contemporary digital spaces (see Brownlee’s comments on CyberC@fes). Click through the link to read more.

 

Keyword Round-up: April on Academia.edu

cropped hillsmooheader.png

Here’s my April keyword round-up from Academia.edu, with an emphasis on “Arguably the Greatest” and imagined communities and sports fans on Wikipedia.

A bit of background: Academia.edu offers scholars analytics data, as well as the opportunity to understand the ways in which their research is being discovered. Using this data, scholars may be able to better frame their research to interested parties. It’s also claimed that this data could help an active academic seek tenure and promotion… I’ll let you know when I get there.

For most of April, I must ashamedly admit, I only had one article posted on my Academia.edu page: “Arguably the Greatest: Sports fans and communities at work on Wikipedia” – a 2009 exploration of the conflict-to-consensus process at work when fans of retired celebrity athletes go to work on framing out these athlete narratives in Wikipedia articles.**

My analytics report shows that four searches performed through Google brought searchers to my Academia.edu page. One of these searches was performed on Google.Au. The search terms were as follows:

  1. arguably the greatest sport fans and communities at work on wikipedia (Google search rank: 2)
  2. ‘arguably the greatest ” phrase (no Google search rank)
  3. meghan arguably the greatest: sport fans and communities at work on wikipedia. sociology of sport journal 26(1): 127-154. (Google search rank: 1)
  4. “imagined communities” “sports writing” (Google search rank: 1)

I found these search terms particularly interesting as two searches were directly seeking my article. How gratifying! The other two search terms suggest ways in which I could frame my research – and I am most motivated to flesh out my work in relation to imagined communities and sports writing.
Finally, the details about the Google rank of my piece were the most fascinating: this 2009 Wikipedia article is popping up as the first or second Google search result; certainly not what I expected as a referral.

In the next keyword round-up, I will discuss how adding an additional, older article about the ascription of cultural values and extension of performance for retired celebrity athletes has changed the incoming traffic for my page; affecting the relationship of profile to document views.

**Watch this space for a development and revisting of my Wikipedia research space in an upcoming piece.