Tag: communication
Keyword Round-up: July on Academia.edu
Meghan
Another monthly round-up of my Academia.edu analytics, with increased visitors and a new paper release in July.
In July 2013, my Academia.edu profile and work entertained 214 “visits” in the form of page views. New visitors made up 156 of those visits—with seven returning visitors—and visitors came from 43 countries to view those pages.
Keywords by the Numbers
Sixteen keyword searches brought visitors to my Academia.edu pages in July. Twelve searches led to “Heroes & Zeroes” – all through Google searches. The searches from Google India, Google Australia, and Google UK (two) were ranked #1. Two searches led to “Changing the Game” and both were referred through Bing searches. One search led to “Arguably the Greatest” and one search to my profile; my Academia.edu profile ranked 13 in a Google search for my name “meghan ferriter.”
The searches that led visitors to “Changing the Game” concerned questions of race and ethnicity in sport. Six searches concerned the term “celebrity,” while three incorporated “narrative.” The term “athlete” also appeared in six searches.
Five searches were performed from the United States, with 2 searches each from the United Kingdom and Australia; all of these searches were performed using Google. The remaining searches were conducted from Argentina, Canada, Ethiopia, France, India, Philippines, and Romania.
Here are the search terms in full and Google search rank, if applicable, in parentheses:
- celebrity retirement sport (1)
- impact of celebrity footballers (1)
- “e-mail addresses and screen names allow users to” (1)
- narrative+on+how+he+becomes+an+athlete (1)
- celebrity athlete career change (1)
- 10 examples of heroic narrative (2)
- journal entries, heroes and zeroes (2)
- why are athletes and celebrities considered heroes (3)
- cultivation of celebrity athletes (4)
- “sociology of sport” athlete retirement (8)
- narrative structure of sports reports (10)
- retired athletes in public service (10)
- meghan ferriter (13)
- can an athlete be a celebrity (no rank)
- ethnicity by professional sport (Bing)
- what are the ideological discourses that position race in sport as a significant classification of people? (Bing)
As suggested in this article, there are limits to the truth of the Academia.edu alert e-mail subject line: “Someone searched for you”. In July, the more appropriate phrasing for me might be “someone discovered you,” with the exception of the search on my name.
Why Followers May Not Be As Important on Academia.edu, a.k.a “Feed vs. Followers”
I gained 9 followers in July, which pales by comparison to the volume of page views. At first glance, this would seem like a poor rate of conversion. Yet that interpretation depends on your goals on Academia.edu – in contrast with one’s purpose on other social networking sites. Here’s another way to spin the low(er) follower numbers: the structure of Academia.edu’s platform allows communities of interest to form around subject fields very easily.
This means researchers and users can create personalized feeds based on their researching interests rather than directly following everyone working in those fields. Indeed, in my case, my work spans several fields and only one of my papers may be useful or relevant to certain disciplines. Through this tagging feature of the platform, potential followers are still receiving word of relevant work by particular researchers through the Academia.edu feed – that is, if it that work is tagged with the research interests into which those potential followers have opted. Of course, I still actively follow researchers and welcome others to follow me, but I am more concerned that my research findings are useful!
Papers, Posts, and Page views
Right after the Wimbledon Championship Men’s final won by Andy Murray, I uploaded my chapter about discourses of age in professional sport titled “The Age Complex.”
During the event, I made a post (similar to a status update) referencing my research. The paper is one of my thesis chapters and explores “age” as a social construction in newspaper media representations of professional football and tennis. Mediated sport discourses of international, professional sport offer a landscape constructed by, and consistently reframed by, age-related discourses that intersect with other aspects of identity – ‘race,’ ethnicity, gender, and sexuality – to create and reinforce inequality. For this reason, discourses of sport are excellent sites to examine age-related hierarchies; we can analyze them to better understand the ways in which age is a cultural resource informing broader relationships of power.
The addition of “The Age Complex” paper had a significant impact on page views in July. Here are the breakdowns of what visitors viewed:
|
Paper |
Views |
| Age Complex | 111 |
| Heroes & Zeroes | 28 |
| The Stories They Tell | 15 |
| Changing the Game (intro thesis chapter) | 3 |
| Arguably the Greatest | 1 |
|
Page |
Views |
| Profile | 48 |
| Posts | 3 |
| Following | 2 |
| CV | 1 |
My M.A. thesis (dissertation) didn’t receive any views this month, while Arguably the Greatest” only garnered one view. This suggests I may need to rethink the research interests with which these pieces are tagged and perhaps create status posts or discussion questions about their content to generate more traffic.
Referrals and Visitors
This month, I found interesting conclusions from the referrals. Continuing the trend from late June, 13 visits were referred by the Academia.edu blog post in which I was featured. Twenty-three visits were referred by Academia.edu – whether from the feed, from documents in various subjects, or from the Smithsonian Institution Archives Department page, with which I am affiliated. Search engines referred 31 visitors – a combination of the above-mentioned searches and other mail and search engines. Two referrals came through Facebook, which was most intriguing! Finally, there was one visit each from my blog and the status post during Murray’s Wimbledon Championships victory. Over 100 visits offered no referral information.
For the most part, these referrals are pushing traffic from within and through the Academia.edu platform. The next challenge will be to move visitors from other places in which I digitally reside, perhaps from LinkedIn, Twitter, or more traffic from this site.
Once again, English-speaking western countries led the way for visitors. Yet the numbers were much different and more widely spread than June. Fewer visits from the United States and Ireland but more from the UK. Countries like Australia, Spain, Germany, Sweden and India moved into the top spots.
The following table presents top countries by views:
| United States | 45 |
| United Kingdom | 40 |
| Australia | 18 |
| Spain | 12 |
| Argentina | 8 |
| Germany | 8 |
| Sweden | 8 |
| India | 7 |
I’ll wrap up these numbers with a quick consideration of visitor pathing or movement between my pages. Most visitors viewed one page but some viewed two separate pages. Visitors who viewed more than one page were likely to move from a paper to my profile or from my profile to an additional page.
Three visitors landed on “The Stories They Tell” and moved to my profile page. One visitor each moved from my profile to my post, from my profile to my CV, and from my profile to “Changing the Game,” my introductory thesis chapter. Finally, five visitors moved from “The Age Complex” to my profile page; one visitor moved from “The Age Complex” to my profile page and back to “The Age Complex” – twice.
Conclusions
Linking a paper with a trending event via a post certainly drove a great amount of traffic to my paper “The Age Complex.” If opportunity presents itself, or if there are upcoming events relating to your work, consider directing people to your work via the Academia.edu feed by way of status update posts.
Most traffic to my work is internal from the Academia.edu platform, although I did have increased traffic from search engines in July. This finding suggests that there is indeed a community of scholars at work on Academia.edu.
Total visits (in the form of page views) to my work and pages increased from May to July by over 500% – from 40 to 214 visits/views. It remains to be seen whether or not those views are “meaningful” – in the sense of whether or not the research I am sharing is useful for other researchers in my communities of interest on Academia.edu.
In summary: once again, keywords brought people in relation to celebrity, athletes and narrative. An additional paper coordinated with an event drove increases in visitors and doubled the previous month’s visits (June to July). Overall, this data can be useful in timing the release of my work, understanding existing audiences, and identifying which research interests I should better cultivate for increased visitor engagement.
Stay tuned for intriguing changes in August traffic in the next Keyword round up.
Where it’s @
Meghan
From FastCompany, a look at the character world’s maven of reinvention – the @ character symbol
With whimsical beginnings as a rose in bookkeeping then moving to the “navel of the digital body we now call the internet,” John Brownlee’s article unravels the @ symbol. Brownlee chats with Keith Houston, author of Shady Characters: The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and other Typographical Marks. The two authors discuss whether @ is where it’ll stay – as THE character representation of people inhabiting digital realms.
It’s a fascinating look at the capability of characters to transcend language barriers. It also speaks to the use of communication strategies through particular character or representational choices. Finally, the appropriate use of the @ symbol is an excellent example of the ways in which one can demonstrate “insider” status or savvy. This knowledge demonstrated by using the symbol appropriately–whether directing comments toward another digital comrade or sending comments through an electronic system–and even sparingly in contemporary digital spaces (see Brownlee’s comments on CyberC@fes). Click through the link to read more.
Sharing stories
Meghan
“A story should have a beginning, a middle, and an end… but not necessarily in that order” – Jean-Luc Godard
On a chilly March morning twilight in 2004, I found myself sitting among a motley group of two bassists and a drummer of varying celebrity plus two students in a dodgy London hotel ballroom. As cabs shuttled past the windows, one of the bassists had us enraptured with tales from touring. He knew how to expertly craft the story he shared and match it with dynamic movements and facial expressions. If I stumble in recalling the stories he shared, I’ll never forget the dramatic pauses and the way he shaped the story to suit the attention of his audience sitting at his feet. A good story is important, but so, too, is the way it is delivered.
A story. Narrative. Myth. History. Discourse. In this kind of town, people are keen to ask “what do you do” – my response used to be some version of “I explore the ways people communicate and share values in cultural products and behaviors.” That IS what I do… but that sounds a bit dull and it only captures part of my goals.
On Thursday evening, I found myself explaining my interests a bit differently. When asked what I do, I answered, “I explore the stories we tell – in person, in the media, and now in online groups – to understand what’s important to each group of people and why; I’m also interested in the WAYS they tell stories: the techniques and technologies they use.” This answer caused my partner in conversation to light up. Although I think I was half-elevator pitching and half-musing aloud, now I think I might be on to something with this description.
From the time we are young, we read and tell stories – we fall in love with adventurous books and characters on screen, we hear parables each weekend and use stories to reinforce grammar, we talk about world events and find the twists and turns of “facts” changing the story. We make meaning by aggregating stories and filtering our experiences through these stories.
Yet, this space is for more than merely explaining stories – this is a landing ground for consideration and discussion of the reasons why and way that we communicate; the social purposes and effects of communication techniques and technologies.
Indeed, it seems we’ve found ourselves in the middle of a larger story here – let’s find ways to navigate this next chapter.